Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions being a window in to the process that is scientific

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions being a window in to the process that is scientific

Current Remarks

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this coming Saturday, on August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a web log about retractions?”

Just exactly What is becoming clear into the intervening nine years is really what a vein that is rich are as tales of what are the results whenever one thing goes incorrect in technology. So when we now have done on a yearly basis at the moment, we’ll review just what took place within the last few one year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is really a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in China have forfeit a 2019 paper as to how LSD could harm vision because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from articles which had showed up the season before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.

The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In line with the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a set of scientists in Saudi Arabia after finding a “serious complaint” about the integrity regarding the information. Nevertheless the author that is first of paper forced right right right back, saying the move ended up being unjustified.

This article, “Successful usage of mixed corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” had been compiled by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgical treatment. It described (with instead grisly images) the way it is of the man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that fixed after the described combination treatment.

But in the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends author that is first of Kumamoto quake paper

The initial writer of a now-retracted paper in technology about the ramifications of the life-threatening 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from their college place for starters 12 months.

Intending Lin, of this Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned by the organization for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism into the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and deceptive” attention research; genetics’ high retraction price

Before we provide this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: can you enjoy our weekly roundup? If so, we’re able to actually make use of your help. Can you think about a tax-deductible contribution to help sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Many Many Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: can you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever wished to hone your talent as a systematic sleuth? Now’s your opportunity.

because of the United states Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), that is devoted to educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a set, Forensics Friday.

Take a good look at the image below, and then simply simply take our poll. From then on, click the website website link below to discover the right response.

Share this:

Cock and legit bull tale contributes to retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients possessed thing for hybrids (think pets, maybe perhaps not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with peoples torsos, winged horses and lions, you can get the image. But a chicken-cow mix wasn’t on that list … until now.

A team of researchers in Brazil has lost a paper in a veterinary log for wanting to reuse information from the chicken research inside their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

The content, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never impact virus replication,” appeared in February into the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey data make fluorosis paper a banner

A article that is recent provided a stark caution in regards to the dangers to young ones of fluoride when you look at the nation’s water happens to be tagged with an expression of concern following the book of a unique paper which undermines the dependability for the initial information.

The content, “Dental fluorosis trends in US oral health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a journal that is dental. The author that is first the paper is Christopher Neurath, regarding the United states Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

The content, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 2011 and 2012, reported “large increases in extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to towards the mid-1980s.

Based on the researchers:

Share this:

Gravitational industries, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: exactly just How did this “pure, utter nonsense” go into in a journal that is peer-reviewed?

Often, a paper arrives this is certainly therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore rather than you will need to do justice to a paper that is recent Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

Articles claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern following an audience notified the log about possible difficulties with the data.

The article, “Phylogenomic analysis of a putative missing link sparks reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 of the 12 months. Based on the writers — a worldwide group that includes scientists during the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

Write a comment